An arguments in favor and against cloning

Contact Author Why Cloning? Cloning animals has lead to a huge discussion on science, religion and the role of tehcnology in our everyday lives.

An arguments in favor and against cloning

Former Bioethics Commissions This staff working paper was discussed at the Council's January meeting. It was prepared by staff solely to aid discussion, and does not represent the official views of the Council or of the United States Government.

Staff Working Paper Arguments for "Reproductive Cloning" This working paper, prepared for the second of our three sessions on human cloning, addresses the following matters: What are the ethical arguments for and against human "reproductive" cloning?

Should society ban it?

An arguments in favor and against cloning

How do advocates of each position respond to the arguments of the other side? How should concern about fundamental human goods such as human nature, culture, family, individuality, rights, and dignity shape our judgment about the ethics of human cloning?

The paper is divided into two distinct sections, 3a and 3b, which present the case in favor of and against "reproductive" cloning, respectively. Arguments for "Reproductive" Cloning The widespread unease, fear, and revulsion that most Americans feel at the idea of cloning human beings is undeniable.

Human cloning challenges long-standing assumptions about human life and human nature. It elicits in many people the image of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein or Aldous Huxley's Brave New World, where biology and science reduce men and women to monsters or machines.

But the stability and wisdom of these prejudices, when viewed in the larger course of human and technological progress, remains an open question.

An arguments in favor and against cloning

How often in history has the unknown and undone been called "evil" or "hubristic" or "impossible," only to become normal, desirable, and celebrated?

How often have new discoveries and new powers over nature been described as fundamental "leaps," when in fact they are a continuation of previous and accepted innovations? Of course, there are certainly technologies that many of us probably wish could be undiscovered.

And the historical fact that individuals and societies have embraced, over time, technologies that they once feared and rejected does not prove that the technologies are good, only that people became convinced that they are good.

In other words, just because something is possible does not mean it is desirable. But equally true is the fact that just because something is new -- even "revolutionary" -- does not mean it ought to be feared and rejected. A sober judgment about human cloning, therefore, requires a full consideration of our prejudices, and perhaps the discovery that our prejudices are not the only or even the best ones.

Arguements #1-2

Among those who desire to clone human beings -- both for experimental and for reproductive purposes -- three human goods or ideas of human good are central: The first is the good of human freedom: The second is the desire to relieve man's estate: The third is the good of human love: This working paper will begin by listing the justifiable -- or potentially justifiable -- reasons for human reproductive cloning, as well as the reasons why human cloning ought not to be banned.

It will then direct most of its attention to reexamining our moral prejudices relevant to human cloning. It will suggest that the public's repugnance against cloning may be extreme or misguided, and not likely to last once or if the technology becomes safe and its good or justifiable uses become apparent.Whereas defenders of cloning have tended to dismiss the arguments against cloning, while elevating the desirability of allowing people to do what they want, several of the arguments against cloning, none of which shows that it is wrong, articulate values with which it is likely to conflict in practice.

Reasons For and Against Human Cloning Recently, the controversy around human cloning has received a lot of news coverage; yet unsurprisingly, a clear and thorough examination of both sides has been lacking from the news media.

The paper is divided into two distinct sections, 3a and 3b, which present the case in favor of and against "reproductive" cloning, respectively. 3a. Arguments for "Reproductive" Cloning.

Reasons For and Against Human Cloning Recently, the controversy around human cloning has received a lot of news coverage; yet unsurprisingly, a clear and thorough examination of both sides has been lacking from the news media. Arguments against cloning appeal to concerns about a clone’s lack of genetic uniqueness and what may be implied because of this. Human cloning is of special interest. Arguments in Favor of Reproductive Cloning and Responses a. Reproductive Liberty: The Only Way to Have a Genetically Related Child. The Argument. Arguments against cloning appeal to concerns about a clone’s lack of genetic uniqueness and what may be implied because of this. Human cloning is of special interest. Arguments in Favor of Reproductive Cloning and Responses a. Reproductive Liberty: The Only Way to .

Arguments Against Reproductive Cloning 1. Reproductive cloning would foster an understanding of children, and of people in general, as objects that can be designed and manufactured to possess specific characteristics.

There are plenty of arguments against cloning - especially against cloning humans - ranging from scientific issues, to the practicality of cloning, to religious objections. On the scientific side, we see that a large percentage of cloning efforts end in failure.

[BINGSNIPMIX-3

Arguments against cloning appeal to concerns about a clone’s lack of genetic uniqueness and what may be implied because of this. Human cloning is of special interest.

Arguments in Favor of Reproductive Cloning and Responses a. Reproductive Liberty: The Only Way to .

Reproductive Cloning Arguments Pro and Con | Center for Genetics and Society